BEING APATHETIC ABOUT VOTER-APATHY IS UNDEMOCRATIC
Well , once again in this election in April 2021 as in previous ones, Chennaities have proved that on voting day morning when it’s time to wake up and go to polling station, they’d rather lay back and laze about on a welcome holiday … Chennai once again recorded the lowest voter turnout in the entire State — less than 60% against the expected state average of about 72%! What a shame for the citizenry of a State capital-city that continues to exhibit the same bilious voter-apathy that as a constituency it has been afflicted by all these years …
I ask myself what is it that motivates a Tamil citizen … especially the Tamil bourgeoisie of the Mylapore constituency of “Tambrahms” where I live … to climb out of bed on Election Day and drag himself to the polling booth? I can’t put my finger on any one or two convincing reasons except to attribute it all to that easy catch-all diagnosis : voter apathy … which only explains away , but hardly truly explains the voter behaviour.
I like to look at the behaviour pattern through the lens of social-class categorisation.
Take the low-to-lower-middle-income or under-privileged classes. What perhaps motivates them to go out on voting day is that they have received , for good or for worse, some sort of material gratification — either lawful or otherwise, in cash or in kind, covertly or overtly — from the local dada of the neighbourhood political party competing with others for “pettai” or “vattam” votes. This is plain and simple to understand motivation. This is classic “vote-for-cash” or “carrot and donkey” or “freebies” theory of voter behaviour.
Next , take the upper-crust of society… I mean the rich , the very rich and the super rich . This constituency goes to the polling-booth and votes on Election Day because it is incentivised in a very real sense to do so . Most political parties competing in elections are either direct or indirect beneficiaries of the rich man’s donation… And remember the brilliant Arun Jaitley thought up the Electoral Bond Scheme mainly to facilitate and legitimise political donations the rich classes wished to make anonymously to politicians under whatever quid pro quo arrangements , either tacit or otherwise, had been struck as unspoken-about and unwritten “deals”between the two . So , here too , plain and simple , the quid pro quo principle more or less easily explains what makes the rich rise from bed on Election Day morning to go and exercise his or her franchise in fine clothes and in their gleaming BMWs and Mercs.
Then there is the glitterati or celebrity class of society that also has its own drivers that makes them to go out and vote. The motivation for cinema-stars, popular cricketers, public performers , philanthropists and VIPs of all plumage and specie is rather easy to understand : Voting Day serves as a great opportunity for most of them to project, showcase and preen their public image … while for some of them it is a rather inexpensive way to remind the public that they are still around and should not be forgotten .
Such self-image projection is often staged through grand gestures and stunts making for good press. Today, we all saw it being reported with great fanfare that the popular but rather slowly fading actor of tinsel town, Mr “Thalapathy” Vijay riding a bicycle from home to the polling booth to cast his vote . A great stunt indeed that is sure to give his image a boost keep it fresh and glittering amongst his legions of fans. Long forgotten also-once-ran actors such as “style king” Sathyaraj, for example , made an entry into a polling booth today and brief TV footage of the event made it to prime time evening news slot .. !
Now then … what about what motivates the ordinary urban middle-class, “honest Joe”, tax-paying citizens of Chennai and its suburbs to drag themselves towards a polling booth on Election Day to do their ordained democratic duty ?
While it’s relatively easy to guess what incentivises the lower, the rich and the famous sections of urban Chennai society to go and vote, I find it very difficult to put a finger on and analyse what disincentivises the great middle-classes of Chennai city to turn up to vote … In other words I’m at a loss to understand what it is that causes their apathy, or the sloth and stupor that we know seems to descend upon them suddenly on voting day.
After thinking about it long and deep , I have come to the conclusion that the only way to incentivise the middle-class member of the Chennai bourgeoisie to go out and vote in large numbers is to severely disincentivise him or her against playing truant and skipping vote on the day altogether.
Here is perhaps how the “apathy-disincentive” might work in my imagination :
A. With the help of the registered voter-lists already prepared by the election commission of India , target those delinquent voters guilty of “no-show” on voting day and failing to fulfill their sacred democratic duty.
B. Pass on the Voter delinquent-list to the Income Tax Department.
C. The IT Dept. then sends a Notice to each delinquent voter informing him or her that in the Return of Income he or she is to file for the relevant financial year, a disallowance amounting to 10% of gross taxable income assessed will be applied as penalty for failing to perform prime civic duty as a citizen of India.
D. The total of such disallowance per completed tax-assessments will be consolidated by the IT Dept. and handed over to the Election Commission of India to be utilised by them for conducting other elections across India .
This I believe would perhaps be one of the effective ways how Voter Apathy in India can be cured.
If democracy in India is to thrive and prosper we, as a nation, have to stop being apathetic about voter-apathy .
Bhaarath Maatha ki Jai
🙏🙏
Sudarshan Madabushi 🇮🇳