On a day when Kamal Haasan was nominated by his party, Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM) to the Rajya Sabha, after the DMK in Tamil Nadu charitably allotted one seat in the Upper House to MNM in return for its support in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, the ageing actor made a thoughtless comment about the Kannada language, which has since stoked controversy, with irate political parties in Karnataka demanding the actor apologise for his statements.
Kannada pride has been deeply hurt. Yet, Kamal Haasan has today stubbornly refused to apologise for his own self-admitted ignorance about the origins of the Kannada language.
This below was Kamal Haasan’s public statement yesterday (made in Bangalore at the launch of his latest movie “Thug’s Life” at which was present the actor-son of yesteryear’s Kannada matinee-idol Rajkumar, an icon of Kannada pride).

“When I was 21 years, Rajkumar anna would praise me for my performance. And every time I met him, he would praise me in front of others. When I made Raja Paarvai, he clapped for the first shot. He did the same for Pushpak, which was shot in Bangalore. This is my family that lives in Bangalore. When I began my speech, I said, ‘Uyire, Uravey, Tamizhey’. Your language came from Tamil…so you are also a part of it””.
Kamal Haasan thought he would say something nice about the long gone cinema icon Rajkumar, his son present in the audience and about the consanguinity of Kannada and Tamil languages. He could have phrased it all differently but in his eagerness to say something cloyingly complimentary to the Kannada people at large, he ended up putting his foot in his mouth.
The stark fact of the matter is that Kannada language did not come from Tamil. And it is not language that binds Kannada and Tamil people to each other but simply Geographical contiguity and common Cultural history.
Soon after he made that clumsy remark about Kannada’s parentage, Kamal Haasan faces now a backlash from Kannada people. They are outraged and want him to issue an apology. But Kamal Haasan is a politician today and will soon a Rajya Sabha MP be! For a politician to eat crow in public and be forced to issue an apology for a mistake can be fatal to his image and gravitas. So, rushing into damage-control-mode Haasan has now issued an explanation to the public again which he has said clearly is not an apology:
“Politicians are not qualified to talk about language, they do not have the education to talk about it and that includes me. Let us leave these in depth discussions to historians, archaeologists, and language experts. We are a family and so are the languages. This is not an answer but an explanation. Love will not apologise”.
Kamal Haasan now ends up putting both feet into his mouth.
He now admits that he belongs to the tribe of politicians in the country “who do not have the education talk about” and engage in “in-depth discussions” on matters such as Linguistics, Archaeology, Culture etc.! The implication is that his fellow-politicians and colleagues … in Karnataka, in Tamil Nadu and yes, in the rest of the country too… are all as ignorant as he is about these subjects! But then because he loves them all … please, they shouldn’t judge him harshly! He, after all, loves them and all Kannadigas, and so “Love will not apologise”!
All these theatrics and political acrobatics of Kamal Haasan amuse me and make me hum to myself the old famous Elton John song, “Sorry seems to be hardest word….”:
What do I do to make you want me?
What have I gotta do to be heard?
What do I say when it’s all over?
And sorry seems to be the hardest word
It’s sad, (so sad) so sad
It’s a sad, sad situation
And it’s getting more and more absurd
It’s sad, (so sad) so sad
Why can’t we talk it over?
Oh, it seems to me
That sorry seems to be the hardest word
***************
Kamal Haasan says that he does not “have the education to talk” competently about the subject of the linguistic origins of the Kannada language. Come on, Mr. Haasan, you can’t be serious!
As a politician you ought to know that the old Latin maxim, “ignorantia juris non excusat”, applies not only to knowledge of the Law. We live today in the age of the Internet, AI search engines and Google online-self-education schools. Not only about Law but any subject on earth, any legal-age adult, and an ordinary, educated citizen of India — who has had at least a secondary school education and wants to get at least acquainted with it — can easily enlighten himself simply by the touch of a key on a laptop keyboard and going online.
If only before making such arrantly nonsensical comment about how “Kannada came from Tamil” you, Kamal Haasan, had not been so intellectually lazy, and if only you had taken the trouble and time to ask just a few sensible questions about the matter on any AI search-engine, you could have avoided the nasty public embarrassment that you face today.
Well, Mr. Haasan, just to jolt you out of your intellectual sloth, let me tell you that on the question of Kannada’s linguistic parentage, I posed only three elementary questions to an AI engine. I was able to instantly obtain answers which I thought I will share with you here for your edification.
Please read the Q&A below and educate yourself…. You will be soon entering the Rajya Sabha as an MP from Tamil Nadu. As A Tamil Nadu citizen I shudder to think that you may in your ignorance and out of the same intellectual laziness, cause us embarrassment there in Parliament in that august Hall of the Peoples’ Assembly of Elders just as equally as you have left us red-faced today in Karnataka.
QUESTION #1: Is Tamil the origin of the Kannada language or Sanskrit ?
Kannada did not originate from Tamil or Sanskrit. Instead, Kannada and Tamil are both independent branches of the Dravidian language family, which means they share a common ancestor known as Proto-Dravidian. Kannada evolved from this Proto-Dravidian root around the 3rd century BCE, just as Tamil did, but each developed separately over time.
Sanskrit, on the other hand, is an Indo-Aryan language and not related genetically to Kannada or Tamil, though it has influenced Kannada (and other Dravidian languages) in vocabulary, grammar, and literary style due to long historical contact. However, Kannada’s core structure and origin are Dravidian, not Sanskritic.
In summary:
• Kannada and Tamil are sister languages, both descending from Proto-Dravidian, not from each other.
• Sanskrit is unrelated in origin but has influenced Kannada through cultural and literary contact.
*********************
QUESTION #2: What is this so-called Proto-Dravidian language ? Where are its origins ?
Proto-Dravidian is the reconstructed ancestor language of the Dravidian family, which includes modern languages like Tamil, Kannada, Telugu, and Malayalam. While not directly attested in historical records, its existence is inferred through linguistic reconstruction based on similarities across Dravidian languages.

Origins and Homeland
• Timeline: Proto-Dravidian is estimated to have been spoken around 4,500–4,000 years ago (3rd–4th millennium BCE), with diversification into branches beginning by the 3rd millennium BCE.
• Geographical Debate:
• Indus Valley Hypothesis: Some scholars link Proto-Dravidian to the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC). Evidence includes Dravidian-like loanwords in Mesopotamian texts (e.g., pīlu for “elephant” and “toothbrush tree”) and potential connections to the Meluhha people mentioned in Sumerian records.
• Peninsular India Hypothesis: Reconstructed Proto-Dravidian terms for flora/fauna (e.g., Salvadora persica, a toothbrush tree) suggest origins in the dry deciduous forests of central or southern India. Genetic studies also associate Dravidian speakers with the Ancestral South Indian (ASI) population, which may have formed in peninsular India.
Key Linguistic Features
Proto-Dravidian had:
• Agglutinative structure: Words formed by adding suffixes to roots.
• Subject-Object-Verb (SOV) syntax: A feature retained in modern Dravidian languages.
• Phonology: A five-vowel system and consonants like retroflex stops (e.g., ṭ), absent in Indo-European languages.
Cultural and Historical Context
• Society: Vocabulary indicates a rural-agrarian economy with elements of trade, metallurgy, and social stratification.
• Interaction with Indo-Aryan Languages: Dravidian loanwords in the Rigveda (e.g., words for “peacock” and “ivory”) suggest early contact between Proto-Dravidian and Sanskrit speakers in the Indo-Gangetic Plain. By the 5th century BCE, Dravidian languages in southern India remained largely unaffected by Sanskrit.
While the exact homeland remains debated, combined linguistic, genetic, and archaeological evidence points to Proto-Dravidian’s emergence in northwestern or central India, with subsequent spread southward.
*********************
QUESTION #3: What clinching linguistic proof or evidence is there to establish the fact that Proto-Dravidian language predated Sanskrit language?
Proto-Dravidian predates Sanskrit by several millennia, with linguistic, phonological, and chronological evidence supporting this timeline.
Here’s the key proof:
1. Dravidian Loanwords in Early Sanskrit
The Rigveda (c. 1500 BCE), the oldest Sanskrit text, contains over 80 loanwords from Dravidian languages, including terms for flora, fauna, and cultural concepts absent in Indo-European languages:
• mayūra (peacock) ← Dravidian mayil .
• phaṇa (hood of a snake) ← Proto-Dravidian paṇ (to spread) .
• ulūkhala (mortar) ← Proto-Dravidian uḷakkai .
These borrowings indicate prolonged contact between Dravidian and early Indo-Aryan speakers, with Proto-Dravidian already established before Vedic Sanskrit emerged.
2. Retroflex Consonants in Sanskrit
Sanskrit’s retroflex consonants (e.g., ṭ, ḍ, ṇ) are absent in other Indo-European languages but central to Dravidian phonology. Their presence in the Rigveda suggests:
• Dravidian speakers influenced Sanskrit’s sound system during its formative period .
• This structural borrowing implies a substrate effect, where Dravidian-speaking populations adopted Indo-Aryan languages but retained phonological habits .
3. Chronological Reconstructions
• Proto-Dravidian: Linguistic reconstruction dates it to ~4,500–4,000 BCE, with diversification into branches (e.g., Tamil, Kannada) by 3,000 BCE .
• Sanskrit: The earliest form (Vedic Sanskrit) emerged ~1,500 BCE, with Classical Sanskrit codified by 500 BCE .
This gap of 2,500–3,000 years underscores Proto-Dravidian’s antiquity relative to Sanskrit.
4. Indus Valley Civilization Link
The Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) (3300–1900 BCE) is increasingly associated with Proto-Dravidian:
• Lexical matches: IVC artifacts (e.g., ivory, sesame) correspond to Proto-Dravidian terms like pīlu (toothbrush tree) and eḷ (sesame), later loaned into Mesopotamian texts .
• Script analysis: Computational studies suggest the undeciphered Indus script may encode a Dravidian language, with signs like “fish” matching Proto-Dravidian mīn .
5. Genetic and Cultural Evidence
• Ancestral South Indian (ASI): Genetic studies tie Dravidian speakers to the ASI population, which diverged from Ancestral North Indians (linked to Indo-Aryans) ~2,000 BCE .
• Agricultural terms: Proto-Dravidian vocabulary reflects a Neolithic agrarian society (e.g., nel for paddy), predating the Bronze Age Indus Valley era .
Conclusion
The convergence of loanwords, phonological influence, reconstructed timelines, and archaeogenetic data confirms Proto-Dravidian’s precedence over Sanskrit. While Sanskrit later influenced Dravidian languages culturally, their core structures diverged millennia earlier.
***************
Good luck to you, Mr Kamal Haasan in your parliamentary career!
Sudarshan Madabushi






































