25-Year-Old Krutrim Techie Found Dead In Bengaluru, Toxic Work Culture Blamed: By NDTV via Dailyhunt
http://dhunt.in/10ndaZ

When I read the above news item I felt very sorry for the young man… what a wasted precious life … !
But what I don’t understand is why did this guy have to take such an extreme step ?!! He after all was a super intelligent guy … securing super GP score in academics ! … But he seems to have lacked the guts to stand up for himself !
Young people these days assert themselves so boldly in other areas of their life … e.g. home , fraternity, consumer, other relationships … why do they buckle to bullying at workplace ?
It’s not enough to be educated . It’s important to show character and possess self-esteem too .
I’ve had a 37 year long career in the corporate world. I too have had to deal with difficult bosses from time to time … but even at the risk of losing my job I managed somehow always to make clear it clear to abusive authority figures that I’d take pressure, workload and deadlines … but never abuse .
Just as no married woman these days has to put up with domestic abuse by the spouse , there’s no need for youngsters like this poor chap to have to put up with workplace abuse by his boss.
Go in peace young man ! God bless .
Now, when I forwarded the above news item with a few of my old good friends who are retired/ semi-retired corporate executives like me , and they had read my reactions to it, it set off immediately a very thoughtful discourse on the larger dimensions of the widespread problem afflicting the contemporary corporate workplace in India : Work-life balance and the place of IQ and EQ (or EI) (Intelligence/ Emotional Quotient/Intelligence) in today’s corporate jungle .
Here is a transcript of our friendly conversation:
Friend 1: Proves the point- IQ and EQ operate on different planes — excelling in one doesn’t ensure strength in the other.
Me: True … our whole school and higher education system is equipped only to develop IQ in our youngsters … for EQ development they’re left on their own . Family these days with both parents busy pursuing their own career and other dreams also are unable to provide the much needed inputs for EQ development . Quite sad !
Friend 1: Totally agree. Our education system is brilliantly designed to sharpen IQ — but leaves EQ to chance. Emotional intelligence isn’t taught, it’s assumed — and in today’s world, that’s a critical gap. With families stretched thin and schools focused on scores, children all over the World grow up intellectually capable but emotionally undernourished.
It’s time we realized that IQ may help you succeed by getting you into the right schools, landing prestigious jobs, or excelling in technical tasks — but it’s EQ that sustains that success over time. Emotional intelligence governs how you navigate stress, handle failure, lead teams, build trust, and maintain relationships — all of which are essential in the real world, especially in leadership and collaborative roles. Without EQ, even the most intellectually gifted individuals can struggle with burnout, conflict, or isolation. Success achieved through IQ can open doors, but without EQ, those doors often close just as quickly.
Me: Yes, good point . But you know I see some correlation between EQ and family antecedents — size, close-knitted-ness, values and stability. In my case, growing up in a large family environment I feel definitely did much to nourish EQ development . Today’s nuclear families unfortunately don’t provide that … That’s sad, if you ask me.
Friend 2: Well, what can be said? … That is the whole story of our generation, isn’t it? The decline of traditional family structure…”
Me: No… not really , I’d say… It is the story that we have told our children in their generation … But it wasn’t the story that our parental generation told us .. was it?
Friend 2: Well… that’s difficult to say conclusively but yes, I do agree, there was a certain firm grounding in our family religious practices, meditation, music -— and all that somehow perhaps did do it’s bit to nurture our EQ …. Let’s say it was some kind of in-built family system or ecology that nourished our EQ. And in the background, of course, given the hard economic circumstances in which TAMBrahm families found themselves in, it was also dire necessity to financially come up in life – so, there was pressure on us to develop our IQ too … EQ was thus left to God and IQ was in our DNA perhaps, who knows? The EQ part was imperceptible but the family liked it to be that way … Like ADHD – syndrome … just recognizing it was Ok, but attending to it and lavishing too much attention to it was some seen as some sort of luxury. Most times, our success in our careers was because of the brute force of IQ that we had to exert in life and not so much due to development of our EQ….
Me: You’re right … And what we experienced in our generational growth-years we simply passed on to our children, didn’t we? We wanted them too to know and be able to exercise the “brute force of IQ” to get ahead and become high-achievers in life.
At any average CBSE school or even State high school, children are burdened with only with heavy-duty, burdensome IQ-driven syllabus… the rigour of tests, exams and academic grilling they are subjected to leaves very little time for teachers or parents to see if they are at the same time getting EQ-fortified life-experiences.
The whole education-system has only one aim: to put the student onto the treadmill of IQ-designed curricula … and keep turning up the gear-speeds. As for EQ fulfilment needs, the student simply has to take recourse to the cinema, smartphone screen-time, Instagram and other online content like Netflix.
Also, when it came to our professional growth-up years … For some inexplicable reason, always in the professional environment in which we worked, emotion was looked upon as weakness of character … “oh, stop… don’t bring emotion into this issue …. Let’s look at it rationally , please. Hang your emotions outside the conference”.
That would always be the manner how executive-C-suite room meetings we know would always be held … Emotion was bad , it always leads to bad decision making … cold rational thinking was business virtue … emotion clouded everything ..
So, when emotion was always denigrated thus and rationality idolised … what happened is that no one even wanted to know or understand what EQ really is.
Moreover, IQ is quantifiable . EQ is always airy fairy … So , that’s why EQ is never regarded as anything to worry about as much as IQ.
Even philosophy , our own Vedanta system, is very partial towards the intellect (buddhi) … while the mind , manas, is always considered to be a monkey … “asthiram” ( restless) and “chanchallam” (capricious) . So, even philosophically, we are all attuned more towards the buddhi than our manas … The EQ is relegated to a lower position than IQ .
The tragedy of it all is also that IQ is statistically determined whereas EQ is behaviourally evaluated. And, if you ask me, the term Quotient is a total misnomer for both. Because “quotient” is a static mathematical concept! It’s not a dynamic function . IQ can be taught to reach it’s full potential… But EQ, it can only be imbibed… and yet no one can tell if it has reached it’s full potential.
******* ********* ********* ********
Then, later in the day, I came upon this other but closely related news-item which also got me thinking hard about the looming crisis ahead for our youngsters in our country… so much like the young man in Bangalore who took his life out, above .
Zoho CEO Sridhar Vembu’s warning to software engineers: Don’t take high salaries for granted, jobs could be destroyed
http://dhunt.in/10mQJy
By The Financial Express via Dailyhunt
Another friend of mine reacted to this story with this view:
“While it is true that AI will take away most of the grunt work, there will still be a growth in demand for software engineers. Way back in 1971 this Company X got an IBM 1301 mainframe computer. Basically to do payroll and some accounting. The union went on strike immediately and we engineers were blocked from entering the office. Eventually some agreement was reached. Instead of jobs being lost (as feared by the union) multiple new jobs were created. All the fuss about computers raised by the Commie unions across India vanished”.
And my reaction to him was this ⬇️ below:
Yes … this narrative did turn out to be true … more computerisation resulted in more jobs of different kinds .
The question is whether AI is just another phase of computerisation or if it’s a beast unlike any other seen in the history of automation of the workplace .
Let us not forget that the biggest expansion of “computer land” and computerisation revolution began with shopfloor CNCs, Y2K , then dot.com, then ERP, CADCAM, … and then again came Internet, and the great worldwide telecom revolution …
All that happened in the time of Globalisation, Freemarket expansion, multilateralism, booming financial markets and not too fettered global immigration.
For 30 years the global environment was such that Technology and Demography did not clash . They were friendly to each other .
That benign environment no longer exists today .
Instead of globalisation we are back to protectionism. Freemarkets are gone , tariffs are in. Technology competition is no longer collaborative but has become adversarial . Immigration is hateful . Job markets are fiercely protected . Intellectual property like AI or Semiconductor manufacturing is jealously guarded . The open system concepts are gone … And the elapse time (for countries keen to catch up in the technology race) between investment and realising outcomes will get longer and longer … unlike in the past when nations did not face many entry-barriers to technology …
In the current state of affairs , new skilling is the buzzword , but it does not guarantee gainful employment for the mass of people in the world. Jobs for people will expand only to fill the space allowed for them by protectionist, xenophobic governments.
Technology and People are no longer friendly … From now onwards, it’s going to be purely transactional relationships between the two .
We live in a Trumpian MAGA world . … remember, and he himself has said , that all the world’s rare earth , semiconductor and AI technology will be for America … and no other countries will be allowed to compete with America .
So, while not disagreeing with your view , I don’t however feel as sanguine about job-markets in the world as you do and much less optimistic about the salubrity of the future corporate workplace.
The motto of IBM once used to be “The purpose of a Company is to enable ordinary people to do extraordinary things”. Well… as I see the future, AI would more likely be doing much of both the ordinary and the extraordinary stuff as well.
Sudarshan Madabushi

























